Licensing Feasibility · Jurisdiction Selection · Readiness Assessment

Licensing Readiness & Gap Assessment

Before incorporating a company, submitting a licence application or committing significant resources to a regulatory project, determine whether the proposed business model fits the intended regulatory pathway. LEX ARTA provides three distinct written assessment services for different stages of a licensing project: testing one selected jurisdiction, comparing alternative regulatory markets or evaluating applicant readiness against an already selected pathway.

Compare Assessments ↓
Three licensing assessment services

Choose the Assessment That Matches Your Current Stage.

The appropriate service, required information and delivery timeline are confirmed after an initial review of the proposed activities, business model and regulatory objectives.

01 · One selected jurisdiction

Licensing Feasibility Review

from €900 Starting fee

A focused preliminary assessment of whether one defined business model appears compatible with the principal licensing or registration requirements of one selected jurisdiction.

Best suited for a founder or business testing a selected regulatory route before company formation or the start of a licensing process.

What is included
  • Preliminary information review
  • Structured consultation of up to 60 minutes
  • Regulated activity and pathway assessment
  • Material eligibility concerns and potential blockers
  • High-level capital, substance, ownership and management considerations
  • Concise written conclusion and recommended next step

The starting fee applies to one clearly defined business model, one selected jurisdiction and one proposed licensing or registration pathway, based on a limited preliminary information set. More complex activity combinations, group structures, cross-border questions or multiple possible pathways are scoped separately. Does not include a detailed AML/CFT document review, application-document audit, formal local-law opinion or comprehensive applicant-readiness assessment.

Request a Feasibility Review →
02 · Alternative regulatory markets

Jurisdiction Selection Report

from €2,500 Two jurisdictions

A structured comparison of alternative jurisdictions for one defined business model, ending in a reasoned written recommendation.

Best suited for businesses choosing a regulatory market before establishing the applicant entity or appointing local providers.

For a detailed MiCA-specific home-state comparison, use the dedicated MiCA Jurisdiction Selection Assessment.

What is included
  • Regulatory pathway and permitted activities in each jurisdiction
  • Capital, substance and local-presence requirements
  • Ownership, management and key-function expectations
  • High-level AML/CFT and governance requirements
  • Availability of banking and payment infrastructure
  • Indicative costs of establishing the applicant structure, obtaining the authorisation and maintaining regulatory status
  • Comparative matrix and written recommendation

The starting fee covers a comparison of two jurisdictions. Additional jurisdictions and unusually complex regulatory regimes are scoped separately. Cost indications are not binding quotations from authorities or local providers. Formal legal and tax opinions are not included.

Request a Jurisdiction Report →
03 · Detailed applicant readiness

Comprehensive Licensing Readiness Assessment

from €4,900 One applicant · one selected pathway

A detailed pre-application diagnostic of the proposed applicant, business model, governance, financial resources, compliance framework, operating arrangements and available evidence against an already selected licensing, registration or affiliation pathway.

Best suited for businesses that have selected a regulatory pathway and want to know whether the applicant is ready before beginning, continuing or restructuring an application.

For MiCA / CASP projects, use the dedicated MiCA Readiness Review rather than the generic readiness assessment.

What is included
  • Regulatory perimeter, proposed activities and target markets
  • Applicant, ownership, group structure and qualifying-holder readiness
  • Capital, financial resources, substance and local-presence requirements
  • Management body, fit-and-proper and key-function readiness
  • AML/CFT readiness where required by the selected regime
  • Safeguarding, custody, outsourcing, technology and operational dependencies
  • Business plan, financial model and application-document inventory
  • Critical-blocker register, prioritised gap matrix and remediation roadmap

The starting fee covers one applicant, one defined business model and one selected licensing pathway. Additional entities, parallel licence classes, extensive document sets, formal local-law opinions and implementation work are scoped separately.

Request a Readiness Assessment →

LEX ARTA does not add VAT. Government and authority fees, local counsel, tax advice, company formation, external audits, local personnel, technology testing and other third-party costs are not included unless expressly stated in the agreed scope.

Decision guide

Which Assessment Do You Need?

01
You have selected a jurisdiction but have not committed to the project.
Choose the Licensing Feasibility Review to test whether one defined business model appears compatible with the principal requirements of that regulatory route.
02
You are still choosing between regulatory markets.
Choose the Jurisdiction Selection Report to compare the agreed jurisdictions before incorporation, local appointments or significant licensing expenditure.
03
You have selected the pathway and need to assess applicant readiness.
Choose the Comprehensive Licensing Readiness Assessment where a structure, operating model, compliance framework or application documentation already exists or is being developed.
Comprehensive review

What a Licensing Readiness Assessment May Cover.

The comprehensive assessment is tailored to the selected licensing pathway. Open the detailed scope if you want to see the areas that may be reviewed.

Explore the full readiness scope

Regulatory Perimeter

  • Proposed regulated activities and service categories
  • Applicable licence, registration or affiliation pathway
  • Territorial scope and target markets
  • Material restrictions, exemptions and dependencies
  • Consistency between the business model and intended authorisation

Applicant Structure

  • Applicant entity, shareholders and beneficial owners
  • Group structure and control arrangements
  • Capital and financial-resource requirements
  • Substance and local-presence requirements
  • Intra-group and outsourcing dependencies

Governance, Prudential and AML/CFT Readiness

  • Management-body composition, responsibilities and reporting lines
  • Fit-and-proper, key-function and local-management readiness
  • Capital, own-funds, financial projections and prudential assumptions
  • Compliance, risk, internal-control and board-oversight arrangements
  • AML/CFT risk assessment, CDD/EDD, sanctions, monitoring and reporting readiness where required

Operations, Technology and Application Evidence

  • Business plan, programme of operations and customer journey
  • Customer, transaction, payment and other asset flows
  • Safeguarding, custody, reconciliation or client-asset arrangements where applicable
  • Outsourcing, technology, cybersecurity and business-continuity dependencies
  • Application-document inventory, evidence mapping and material inconsistencies
Written outcome

What You Receive

  • A concise feasibility conclusion, comparative report or detailed readiness assessment, depending on the selected service
  • Material regulatory concerns, blockers and dependencies
  • Identified structural, governance, compliance or documentation gaps
  • Reasoned recommendations and prioritised next steps
  • A gap matrix and remediation roadmap for a comprehensive assessment
  • Identification of matters requiring qualified local professional input
Scope boundaries

What Is Not Included by Default

  • Implementation of identified remediation measures
  • Drafting of the complete licensing application package
  • Application submission or representation before a regulator
  • Formal jurisdiction-specific legal or tax opinions
  • Company incorporation or appointment of local personnel
  • Technology testing, cybersecurity audit or financial audit

Any additional work is included only where expressly set out in a separate agreed scope.

Why LEX ARTA

A Decision-Ready Licensing Assessment — Not a Generic Regulatory Memo.

Each assessment is designed to answer a defined business question: whether a proposed licensing route appears viable, which jurisdiction is more appropriate, or whether an applicant is sufficiently prepared to move into the licensing process.

Evidence-Based Analysis

The assessment is based on the proposed activities, ownership, target markets, transaction and asset flows, operational model and available project documentation.

Clear Written Outcome

Every engagement ends with a defined written deliverable — from a concise feasibility conclusion to a jurisdiction comparison or detailed readiness and remediation report.

Material Issues Prioritised

The focus is on issues that may materially affect licensing feasibility, applicant readiness, regulatory credibility, cost or implementation.

Independent Route Selection

Jurisdictions and licensing pathways are assessed against the client’s actual business model and operational capacity rather than selected because a particular market is easier to promote.

Assessment process

A Clear Route to a Written Decision.

The information request, fee, deliverable and timing are confirmed before substantive work begins.

01
Scope the Question
Confirm the proposed activities, selected or alternative jurisdictions, project stage and the decision the assessment needs to support.
02
Review the Model and Evidence
Review the relevant ownership, flows, operating model, financial assumptions and available documentation within the agreed scope.
03
Regulatory Analysis
Assess the project against the selected regime or compare jurisdictions using consistent regulatory, operational and commercial criteria.
04
Written Findings and Next Steps
Receive the applicable written conclusion, comparison or readiness report with material blockers, priorities and recommended next actions.
Frequently asked

Questions About Licensing Assessments.

Choose the Licensing Feasibility Review if one jurisdiction has already been selected and you need a preliminary viability check. Choose the Jurisdiction Selection Report if you are comparing regulatory markets. Choose the Comprehensive Licensing Readiness Assessment if a pathway has been selected and you need a detailed pre-application review of the applicant, operating model, controls and available evidence.

The Feasibility Review tests whether one defined model appears viable in one selected jurisdiction. The Readiness Assessment is a deeper diagnostic of an already selected pathway and reviews the proposed applicant, governance, financial resources, compliance arrangements, operations, technology dependencies and application evidence.

It is appropriate where the business has not yet selected the regulatory market and needs a structured comparison before incorporation, appointment of local providers or significant licensing expenditure.

Yes. The Feasibility Review includes a concise written conclusion. The Jurisdiction Selection Report includes a comparative matrix and reasoned recommendation. The Comprehensive Licensing Readiness Assessment includes a detailed readiness report, critical-blocker register, prioritised gap matrix and remediation roadmap.

It identifies high-level AML/CFT requirements where they materially affect the viability of the selected route. It does not include a policy-by-policy AML review, operational-control testing or a full AML/CFT framework audit.

Yes, where the selected regime imposes AML/CFT obligations. The assessment reviews the readiness of the risk assessment, governance, customer due diligence, sanctions, transaction monitoring, reporting and related evidence at a pre-application level. It is not a substitute for a full independent AML audit unless separately agreed.

Not by default. The assessments provide regulatory and compliance analysis within the agreed scope. Formal jurisdiction-specific legal or tax opinions may be coordinated separately with appropriately qualified local professionals where required.

The Licensing Feasibility Review starts from €900 for one clearly defined business model, one selected jurisdiction and one proposed licensing or registration pathway based on a limited preliminary information set. More complex activity combinations, group structures, cross-border questions or multiple possible pathways require an adjusted scope. The Jurisdiction Selection Report starts from €2,500 for two jurisdictions. The Comprehensive Licensing Readiness Assessment starts from €4,900 for one applicant and one selected licensing pathway. The final scope, fee, information request and delivery timeline are confirmed before work begins.

Start with the Right Regulatory Question.
Tell us about your business model, proposed activities, target markets and current project stage. We will confirm whether you need a feasibility review, a jurisdiction comparison or a comprehensive licensing readiness assessment before the engagement begins.